<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenOffice vs. Microsoft &#8220;standards&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.generatorx.no/20051124/openoffice-vs-microsoft-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.generatorx.no/20051124/openoffice-vs-microsoft-standards/</link>
	<description>Software and generative strategies in art and design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:42:29 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kreshna Iceheart</title>
		<link>http://www.generatorx.no/20051124/openoffice-vs-microsoft-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-49198</link>
		<dc:creator>Kreshna Iceheart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.generatorx.no/?p=322#comment-49198</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using OpenOffice 2.0 for almost a year, and I found the ODF format generally consumes less space than MS Office document format. Compare Writer&#039;s  .odt with MS Word&#039;s .doc, and you know what I mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using OpenOffice 2.0 for almost a year, and I found the ODF format generally consumes less space than MS Office document format. Compare Writer&#8217;s  .odt with MS Word&#8217;s .doc, and you know what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

